On Thursday, a worldwide team of researchers arrived in the Chinese city where the coronavirus pandemic was first identified to perform a politically charged investigation into its sources in the face of doubt as to whether Beijing might attempt to prevent humiliating discoveries.
After months of diplomatic wrangling that triggered an extraordinary public protest by the head of the WHO, the 10-member team sent to Wuhan by the World Health Organization was approved by President Xi Jinping’s government.
Scientists believe that the virus that has killed 1.9 million people since late 2019 has moved from bats or other species to humans, most likely in the southwest of China. Stung by accusations that it permitted the disease to spread, the ruling Communist Party claims the virus originated from abroad, probably imported fish, but that is denied by scientists.
The team arrived at the airport in Wuhan a little after 11 a.m. He walked through an improvised transparent plastic tunnel into the airport on a bright-yellow Scoot flight. The researchers, who only wear face masks, were welcomed in full protective gear by airport personnel, complete with masks, goggles and full body suits.
Viruses and other specialists from the United States, Australia, Germany, Japan, Britain, Russia, the Netherlands, Qatar and Vietnam are among the team members.
A government spokesman said they would “exchange views” with Chinese scientists this week, but gave no indication whether they would be authorized to collect data.
According to CGTN, the English-language channel of state broadcaster CCTV, they will undergo a two-week quarantine as well as a throat swab test and an antibody test for COVID-19. They are to start working while in quarantine with Chinese experts via video conference.
After the Trump administration blamed Beijing for the spread of the virus, China dismissed demands for an international investigation, which plunged the global economy into its worst recession since the 1930s.
Beijing retaliated by banning imports of Australian beef, wine and other products after Australia called for an independent inquiry in April.
One possibility is that in November, one of the WHO team members, zoologist Peter Daszak of the U.S. community EcoHealth Alliance, told the Associated Press, a wildlife poacher may have transmitted the virus to traders who took it to Wuhan.
It is doubtful that a single visit by scientists will confirm the source of the virus; pinning down the animal reservoir of an epidemic is usually an exhaustive undertaking that requires years of study, including animal sampling, genetic analysis and epidemiological studies.
The Chinese government has been attempting to stir uncertainty about the sources of the virus. It has supported hypotheses that the outbreak may have begun with imports of infected seafood, a notion dismissed by international scientists and agencies, with little evidence.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology in the city where the outbreak started, is a potential target for investigators. After the 2003 outbreak of Extreme Acute Respiratory Syndrome, one of China’s top virus research laboratories created an archive of genetic knowledge about bat coronaviruses.
There are no plans to determine whether there may have been an accidental release of the coronavirus at the Wuhan lab, according to the published WHO agenda for its original study, as some American politicians, including President Donald Trump, have reported.
Mark Woolhouse, an epidemiologist at the University of Edinburgh, said a “scientific audit” of Institute documents and safety measures would be a “routine activity.” It depends, he said, on how eager the Chinese authorities are to exchange data.
An AP investigation found that the government had placed restrictions on outbreak studies and prohibited scientists from talking to reporters.
Although identifying exactly the same COVID-19 virus in animals as in humans may be difficult, finding similar viruses may help explain how the disease first spread from animals and clarify what preventive measures are required to avoid potential epidemics.
Instead, scientists should concentrate on developing a “comprehensive image” of the virus to help respond to potential outbreaks, Woolhouse said.
Source: Associated Press
Penang Govt Wants Local Authority Staff Classified As Frontliners
GEORGE TOWN, March 2 — The Penang government has urged the federal government to recognise local government staff as frontliners under the National COVID-19 Immunisation Programme.
State Housing, Local Government, and Town and Country Planning Committee chairman Jagdeep Singh Deo said these workers have always been on the ground to check on premises to ensure the standard operating procedures (SOPs) are strictly followed since the first nationwide Movement Control Order (MCO) was implemented on March 18 last year.
He said both the Penang Island City Council (MBPP) and Seberang Perai City Council (MBSP) were also involved in conducting joint public health and security operations with the Royal Malaysia Police and Ministry of Health (MOH).
“In this regard, I will be raising this issue at the 77th Local Government National Assembly meeting this afternoon which will be chaired by Senior Minister (Works) Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof, and hope to get an explanation of this matter,” he said in a press conference after conducting SOP checks at Chowrasta Market here today.
Jagdeep was commenting on the guidelines for the definition of frontliners in the National COVID-19 immunisation programme issued yesterday by the Special Committee for Ensuring Access to COVID-19 Vaccine Supply (JKJAV).
According to him, the guidelines classify frontliners under two categories, with Category One for those involved directly in providing medical treatment to patients and Category Two for individuals from healthcare, defence, security and essential services sectors.
He said representatives of the local government office were not under Category Two of the guidelines.
“We hope the JKJAV would also refine this issue and include local authorities throughout the country in the list of frontliners under Category Two of the guidelines,” he added.
RM1.2 Million Successfully Raised In One Day For Premature Malaysian Baby Born In Singapore
Even though the situation nowadays may seem like it is a very hard world to live in, but people have to still got faith and hope because there are still many kind-hearted people out there who are willing to help anyone. This is what happened towards a family when great people all around the world have raised a total of RM1.2 million for a particular Malaysian premature baby born in Singapore. Surprisingly, the amount was achieved one day after the urgent fundraiser was announced.
The Penang-based organization that is the One Hope Charity & Welfare said in a statement, “Both her parents and the public from all over the world have given the infant who was born at just 24 weeks the faith to fight for her life”. The specific charity has achieved its goal within 29 hours of announcing the donation campaign on its website.
The statement mentioned that the donation did not only received from donors in Malaysia, but contributions also came from Singapore, Brunei, Taiwan, the United States, and many other countries, giving blessings to the baby. The premature baby was born in Singapore at the age of 24 weeks old after her parents who worked there did not manage to return to Malaysia in time before the baby got delivered.
The parents have actually planned to deliver the child back in Sungai Petani, Kedah when the baby was at least 32 weeks pregnant. Unfortunately, the plan did not go well because, on the 22nd of February, the mother went through preterm labor at only 24 weeks after a few days of experiencing abdominal pain. She was then rushed to a hospital in Singapore where her daughter was delivered in an emergency.
The premature baby weighed only 670g and was the size of an adult hand when delivered. Even though the body of the baby appeared to be fully developed, they said many of her internal organs such as her lungs and also her brain were not functioning well. She was admitted to the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) immediately to be placed in an incubator and be given breathing aid.
They said, “Her skin was nearly transparent so that her bloodstream can be seen with the naked eye. Not only must she be taken great care of, she has to be constantly monitored even for the most minute changes”. The doctors then advised the parents that the baby has to stay in an incubator until she reaches an appropriate gestational age and that may take another 160 days. Because of that, the new parents seek the help of ‘One Hope Charity’ when they found out the medical fee was estimated to be RM1.25 million for the whole duration.
So far, the baby’s growth and development, fortunately, have been positive. The charity announced, “Her body weight has gradually increased, and the baby can be safely incubated until her growth development is stable”. They also added, “If her condition is stable, the hospital can arrange for her transfer back to a hospital in Malaysia for observation”.
Sources: One Hope Charity & Welfare.
Differences Between ‘Expiry Date’, ‘Use Before’ And ‘Best Before’ On Food Labels
Every food product ever made in this world that involves food either dry or even wet must have specific labels that state the duration of the food is suitable for use. But if anyone ever notices, there are actually 3 different types of terms that are often used by food manufacturers. The 3 types are the ‘Expire Date’, ‘Use Before / Use By’ and also the ‘Best Before’.
It is very important for everyone to understand the different types of dates and also advice on different food packaging that are made. The differences for these 3 terms are:
1) ‘Expiry Date’
‘Expiry Date’ refers to the expiration date of the food which is also means it is the deadline for the food product to be used. If it is beyond the shown date, the food product can no longer be used by anyone. This label is commonly used in liquid food products as well as formula milk. Expiration dates tell the consumers the last day a product is safe to consume.
2) ‘Use Before/Use By’
The term ‘use before/use by’ means that the product made can only be eaten until the specified date. If it is beyond that date, food is at risk of spoilage and is no longer safe to use. Products with this label can be eaten or frozen until the date stated only. Among them are frozen products such as meat, fish, and salads. This date on food is actually about the safety of consumption for a human beings. This is the most important date to remember. For the ‘use before/use by’ date to be a valid guide, the storage instructions must be carefully followed.
3) ‘Best Before’
The term ‘best before’ is about the quality of the foods. This ‘best before’ product only refers to the best quality of the product. Meaning, foods that exceed the ‘best before’ date are still safe to eat. Foods that use this label are usually dry foods, canned foods, and frozen foods. The ‘best before’ date guarantees certain properties of the product to be effective up to this point. Once the date has passed, it may just lose its freshness, taste, aroma, or nutrients. But it does not necessarily mean that the food is no longer safe to eat.
News7 days ago
Tiger Woods Injured After Being Involved In A Car Accident, Suffered Broken Legs And Ankle
Lifestyle7 days ago
(Video) 141-Year-Old Victorian Historic House Moved To New Location In San Francisco
Lifestyle7 days ago
Starbucks Malaysia Releases Brand New Salted Caramel Cloud Macchiato Series
Health7 days ago
Muhyiddin Set To Receive First Pfizer Vaccine Today
News6 days ago
NASA’s Perseverance Rover Gives Its First High-Definition Look Around Mars
Lifestyle7 days ago
Old Man Celebrate 100th Birthday, Receive Wedding Ring Gift That Had Lost 5 Years Ago
Lifestyle2 days ago
Best Mosquito Killing Incense Shared By Malaysians, Bought On Shopee For RM1
News6 days ago
Man Faking His Own Kidnapping, Making It As An Excuse Not To Go To Work